![]() ![]() They believe that the sun and moon are 3000 miles above, and 32 miles each in diameter. I am inclined not to trust paleo-magnetic for accurate reconstructions of the earths continental placement in the past.They also discount the heliocentric model of our earth. Cross reference the movement of the mediterranean sea.įor this reason ( and a few others ). It is important to note that this newer map of the sea floor is in conflict with some recent paleo-magnetic interpretation of the continental placements. I do believe that the "drift" of the continents relative to each other would be the same regardless if it were on a flat earth or a round earth. This of course has been mapped to the RE model. This in combination with radiometrics allows people gauge the age of the sea floor. As the continents move apart the cracks are filled with lava. The sea floor spreads are cracks in which run along the whole surface of the earth. There is an another important method used to map the "drift" of continents over time. Since the magnetic field of the earth is constantly changing, breaking up and flipping, it certainly cannot be used to prove or disprove a flat earth or even a round earth imo. Making "logical" averages one then decides how the pieces have drifted over time. At the time a rock cools magnetic direction is trapped. One of the most important tools used to determine the location of continents in the past is Paleo-magnetism. the geography of the continents is matched not only through the shape of the continents but through landmasses, large igneous provinces, orogenies, evolution patterns, climate changes and such. I am not sure if an FE'er would have a definitive solution to the evolution of the continents vs a RE'er.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |